Wednesday, March 31, 2010
NUMMI Closes
General Motors and Toyota joint ventured to establish NUMMI in 1984. This week the last of 7.7 million vehicles will leave the assembly line and the plant will close. As this article points out NUMMI was an American success story. Its demise has more to do with it being 25 years old than GM and its unions.
The worldwide value of femaleness
The Economist has an interesting Article not strictly employment related, but fascinating nevertheless. The Worldwide War on Baby Girls explores the consequences of China's one child policy, and the skewed birth statistics which have resulted. The issue is not limited to China as India and parts of the old Soviet Union have an increased disparity. By 2020 China may have 40 Million more males under 20 than it has females. Thats roughly as many as the entire United States population of males under twenty is estimated to be. The social consequences of millions of young men in a society unable to marry are mind boggling - increased crime rate for one. Will the theory of unintended consequences derail China's emergence as a worldwide economic superpower?
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Car sales fall, membership falls too
Membership in the United Auto Workers Union (UAW) declined 18% in 2009.
Monday, March 29, 2010
When is attendance an essential job function?
Attendance, FMLA and the ADA. The combination can be a toxic brew for employers. When does intermittent absence render an employee unqualified? The Fifth Circuit's opinion in Carmona v. Southwest Airlines Company provides an interesting answer. More after the jump.
Becker gets recess appointment
President Obama will use recess appointments to by-pass Senate confirmation for 15 high level appointments including Craig Becker's appointment to the NLRB, as well as that of another Democrat, Mark Gaston Pearce. The NLRB's press release is here. Interesting move in not appointing anyone to the 5th seat on the Board. As it stands now, Democrats are guaranteed to be the majority of every three member panel of the NLRB.
Saturday, March 27, 2010
Local 100
SEIU Local 100 is no more. Local 100 is now an independent entity and has reverted to its old name United Labor Unions Local 100.
Got milk?
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act contains a few surprises. New FLSA section (29 U.S.C. 207(r)(1) requires employers employing 50 employees or more to provide "reasonable" unpaid breaks and a private space, other than a restroom, for mothers to express milk unless to do so would “impose an undue hardship by causing the employer significant difficulty or expense.”
Friday, March 26, 2010
Mixed Motive retaliation lives
A divided Fifth Circuit panel has ruled that a mixed motive instruction in a Title VII retaliation case is appropriate, does not require direct evidence to support it, and is not inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., 129 S. Ct. 23 43 (2009). The majority opinion (Reavely and Wiener) is a must read for practitioners in the Fifth Circuit. It presents the past and present law of the Circuit in a straightforward, understandable opinion. The dissent (Jolly) notes the decision conflicts with the Seventh Circuit's ruling in Serwatka v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., 591 F.3d 957, 961 (7th Cir. 2010).
Thursday, March 25, 2010
One half 20 questions
Mike Florio analyzes the ten questions the players union has posed to the NFL.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Organizing mom and pop
Here's an interesting account of the efforts of one young employee to unionize a family business. The headline is misleading because the efforts started before he was fired. The point here for employers is the dispute really isn't over wages and benefits, rather its over irritants many employers wont see or acknowledge. It is these irritants, and management's failure to provide an acceptable rationale for its policies, that drive employees to seek third party representation, more than wage benefit issues.
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
2 member NLRB decisions
Workplace Prof's Blog has a great post on the oral argument in New Process Steel.
HCR 2
David Frum again makes sense noting the issues on which the GOP can regroup on healthcare, and the ones that will continue to destroy all possibility of either civilized discourse or reform. Frum is particularly on point about employer provided insurance as being the original sin of healthcare, as well as fines on employers who discontinue healthcare being a lousy solution.
Monday, March 22, 2010
HCR
We've stayed away from posting about healthcare, because until now, there was little definite about anything in the package. Now there is. This political football surely will affect employers and employees for years to come. We're not sure that the final product will be nearly as unpopular as the sausage making appeared to be. For one, there are some immediate and concrete benefits to a wide range of employees. Being able to carry your college graduate, but unemployed child on a parents' plan to age 27 for one. We suspect there will be many people realizing concrete, immediate unexpected benefits from the plan. CNN's poll showing only 39% favoring the bill and 59% against, is misleading. When broken down as to why people opposed the bill only 43% opposed it because it was too liberal, and 13% said they opposed it because it was not liberal enough. Now, while substantial confusion remains concerning the substantive provisions, 52% polled either out right favored the bill or thought it did not go far enough. Remember President Obama received less than 53% of the vote in 2008. There is a very real prospect that HCR will grow in popularity as its provisions become known, and the hysterical posturing by opponents does not come to pass. Even conservatives are pessimistic about riding healthcare to electoral wins. For those of us who believe in limited government, and personal responsibility, its easy to be concerned for the future. By abdicating responsibility and demonizing reform rather than participating in it, Republicans inherit responsibility for many aspects of this bill, which could have been made better by reasonable attempts to compromise. The party of Lincoln, T. Roosevelt and Reagan has been overrun by what David Frum calls the Republican entertainment industry. Long term, the opinions of that industry, of Beck, Limbaugh, Savage, and their ilk will continue to weaken the Republican brand and diminish the broad appeal necessary to be a national party.
Laptop surveillance
We previously posted about the school in Pennsylvania that surreptitiously activated laptop cameras to record activity while students were at home. While schools and employers arguably could impose a duty to consent to such monitoring in return for use of the school or company computer, the school had not amended its computer use policy to take that into account. Here's an extended post following up on the controversy. It gives more background about the controversy, including the cost of the software ($156,357) and the fact that the software company's new owner is discontinuing the video surveillance option.
Labels:
employee consent,
laptop,
law school,
spying,
video surveillance
Sunday, March 21, 2010
MLS, players reach agreement
The only MLS strikers will be on the pitch. Major League soccer and the players reached agreement on a contract providing guaranteed salaries, some player mobility and raises.
Friday, March 19, 2010
New Process Steel
Scotusblog has a good post on the Parties arguments in the 2 Member NLRB case set for oral argument on March 23.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Big Bucks for Big Labor
At pro-union LABORnotes a new post presents the startling fact that 10,000 union officials and staff earned over $100,000 in annual compensation in 2008, the last year with complete statistics. The information is compiled from data required to be filed under the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA). This number has tripled since 2000.
EFCA status
Industry Week has a non-hysterical piece on EFCA which provides good information on its status and quotes from both manufacturing groups and labor. Bottom line, passage is unlikely, but labor remains optimistic.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
First Amendment and the NLRA
On March 11, the NLRB requested en banc consideration of a divided 9th Circuit panel opinion in McDermott v. Ampersand Publ'g LLC d/b/a Santa Barbara News-Press, 9th Cir., No. 08-56202. In that case the majority found a 10(j) injunction in favor of reporters asserting a violation of the NLRA would run afoul of the employer's First Amendment rights. Our previous post on the panel decision is here.
Car proxy wars
We have previously posted here and here about the silly attempt to make car manufacturers proxies in the union/anti-union wars and in the red blue game. Bob Herbert's NYT opinion piece provides fuel and a black hat portrait of Toyota and its decision to close NUMMI and the impact of job losses in California.
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Facts matter
Columnist Leonard Pitts, Jr. spoke last night at Loyola Law School. His topic, facts matter. On this issue he is absolutely on target as we have previously blogged. The Times Picayune article is here.
Monday, March 15, 2010
The boss' right to know
Workplace privacy has been virtually eradicated by technology and a judicial climate supporting nosey employers, according to this AFL-CIO blogger.
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Walking in New Orleans
We've had a long winter. Its nothing compared to the Upper Midwest or the Northeast, but still more cold and dreary rain than wanted. Yesterday, however, was a glorious spring day and perfect for a long, mind settling walk. More after the jump
Friday, March 12, 2010
Love/hate
Labor has begun to push back against incumbent Democrats who have, in labor's view, failed to support labor's legislative agenda.
MLS strike vote
When my son was playing youth soccer, one year he played on a team called the "Strikers." Knowledgeable soccer fans know the origins of the term. As a labor and employment attorney my friends made a few comments about me hanging with a bunch of, uh, strikers. All in good fun, of course. Now Major League Soccer players are likely to experience what it is to be a striker off the field. 350 MLS players reportedly voted overwhelmingly to authorize a strike if they do not have a collective bargaining agreement in place before the beginning of the season.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Is a law partner an employee?
Often law firms force or "incentivise" partners into "senior status" when they reach a certain age. One New York firm has been sued by the EEOC on behalf of a 79 year old partner forced to give up his equity interest at age 70, and allegedly paid less than younger partners despite comparable or better billings and collections. Key issue: Are partners employees for purposes of ADEA? The New York Law Journal has background here.
EFCA in context
This John C. Ryan piece at Huffington Post provides insight into the EFCA issue. Interesting points about union discrimination, affirmative action and diversity. All in all its a pretty non-hysterical look at views on EFCA by current union members.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Knock, knock
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has targeted employers in five states (Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas and Tennessee) for inspections to ensure compliance with I-9 employment eligibility verification.
EFCA in context
"Third generation union organizer" Mike Elk's piece confirming EFCA is dead started it by suggesting the EFCA battle is one with larger themes and objectives than, uh, EFCA. Then came the crying "fowl" in this post by J. Justin Wilson claiming the EFCA fight is war by proxy in "a larger conflict about political sway, public opinion, and economic ideology." One is forced to pause here and consider whether Wilson is referring to Galliformes or Anseriformes, or as is likely, neither, but I digress. Elk retorts at Firedoglake calling Wilson "the corporate version of that creepy hit man from No Country for Old Men." Elk's position? Wilson, tool of Wall Street, needs to continue destroying unions to continue destroying the economy. You can't make this stuff up . . .
Labels:
EFCA,
Elk,
Employee Free Choice Act,
fowl,
J. Justin Wilson,
labor reform,
recession,
Wall Street
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Recess for Becker?
John Judis in this piece in The New Republic makes the case for President Obama to "put [Craig] Becker on the NLRB via recess appointment."
Labels:
Craig Becker,
Judis,
NLRB,
recess appointment,
The New Republic
Monday, March 8, 2010
Fair and balanced?
A former chief economist for the DoL does a good job of putting in perspective some conservative talking points about the evil that is organized labor.
Friday, March 5, 2010
Unemployment unchanged
The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the nations unemployment rate remained steady at 9.7%.
EFCA would create "teh" jobs
There is no shortage of opinion in this post about jobs creation and EFCA, just an utter absence of facts.
NLRA politics 101
I have to chuckle when I see posts like this complaining that the NLRB is political. Its designed that way, and pretty much has been institutionally an entity which furthers the interests of unions and unionization. It's that way because the NLRA is that way. One need only read the Section 1 "Findings and Policies" 29 U.S.C. § 151.
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Smelling the roses bowl
Seems a strike and subsequent lockout at the University of Alabama is attributable to the awakening that occurred when the two schools met in the Rose Bowl. That's where First Transit's Alabama drivers became aware that First Transit's Texas drivers made a lot more green.
Becker appointment to NLRB
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis suggests action on the Becker NLRB appointment will please labor. Recess appointment? Not sure, but solis told labor leaders they would be "very pleased."
Labor's 2010 midterm strategy
Labor's disappointment with the accomplishments of the current administration is visible. Pundits have suggested labor would sit out the 2010 elections. But the AFL-CIO has announced its rational mid-term strategy to firewall vulnerable democrats in union strongholds like New York, California, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Illinois. The AFL-CIO pledges to spend more than the $53 Million it spent electing President Obama. Democrats who have not supported labor's agenda can expect labor will support primary opponents.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Peoples need good EFCA
This piece at progressive site Firedoglake inconsistently and inaccurately describes the effect of old EFCA and its card check provisions. On the one hand he says EFCA allows prompt unionization, while on the other says it does not eliminate secret ballot determinations of majority status, which it does de facto. The interesting part is the guy does understand human resource management, at least the employee participation and motivation aspects. The thinking goes awry when he embraces quickie unionization as an appropriate counterpoint to unilateral management action, which the poster seems to assume, is always is detrimental to employees. But what occurs when an emotional, but insignificant issue sweeps through a workforce prompting card signing, resulting in unionization of a workplace under EFCA. Quickie determinations of majority status may not be enduring ones. Because EFCA provides no corresponding method for decertification on an expedited basis, employees cannot act immediately, in ways the poster suggests empowers them appropriately when dealing with management. The same check on union excesses is needed, but absent because unions are provided a period of irrebuttable presumption of continuing majority status. To be intellectually honest, EFCA proponents must address this logical flaw.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Mid-term troubles for incumbent
Senator Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark) has a primary opponent and the AFL-CIO has pledged $3,000,000.00 to him according to TPM.
Toyota facts
In an interesting follow up to yesterday's post about bashing labor as a cause for Toyota's ills, WNOL posted the this analysis of the political players. Key point, the investigators do not include "rust belt" senators arguably more beholding to American carmakers.
Monday, March 1, 2010
Facts matter, again
Another "facts matter" example of making a anti-labor point with questionable facts and logic. This opinion piece blames General Motors and its political friends in Washington for Toyota's recent image bashing. While there may be a lot of reasons to blame the UAW for the decline of American carmakers, this connection just seems weird. Essentially the writer says the PR bloodbath Toyota has taken is fueled by tools of the UAW. The reality is Toyota made some flawed products, and here are some of the problems not caused by the UAW, and as this article notes, there are plenty of deaths and lawsuits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)