Shhhhhhhhh! Can't say that

Vaughan v. Woodforest Bank (5th Cir. 12/21/11) is an interesting case where a white branch manager was terminated by her white supervisor for "unsatisfactory performance" and comments allegedly made which had a racial component. The supervisor testified that “we cannot talk about race in the workplace” and that “if you talk about race in the workplace it’s racial discrimination.” She also elaborated on Vaughn’s “unsatisfactory conduct,” stating that there were three “racial” occurrences that formed the basis of her decision to fire Vaughn. The Court does a good job of deconstructing the comments and explaining why the employee has created a sufficient factual dispute to avoid summary judgment. To me though the unstated rationale is the Court's conclusion no minority employee would have been terminated for the reasons proffered.