Showing posts with label representation proceedings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label representation proceedings. Show all posts

Sunday, April 29, 2012

GC Solomon issues "R" case guidance

NLRB Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon issued a guidance memorandum concerning the NLRB's new procedures for handling representation elections. The new procedures take effect tomorrow, April 30th.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

USCC v. NLRB

The U. S. Chamber of Commerce has sued the National Labor Relations Board to prevent implementation of the revised rules for conducting union elections. The complaint is here.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

NLRB adopts some new election rules

By a 2 -1 vote the NLRB adopted new rules for the election process. This is a less than sweeping change, and only addresses a few issues set out in the previous post.

NLRB election revisions released

The NLRB is scheduled to vote today on a partial set of proposed revisions to the way in which the NLRB conducts representation elections which determine whether a union represents a majority of the employees in a unit appropriate for collective bargaining. The NLRB explanation of the proposal is here. The proposals under consideration today appear to be a modest, partial list. If passed the proposals will be drafted into final regulations. These proposals limits the issues which may be raised at the hearing and makes the right to brief the issues contingent upon the hearing officer determining briefing is necessary. Given the modest nature of these proposals, its unlikely Member Hayes will express his opposition in a dramatic way.

Saturday, November 19, 2011

New election rules imminent?

The NLRB has issued a press release setting a November 30th vote on some portion of the new rules proposed for conducting NLRB elections. Is this a "ram through" of quickie elections before Member Becker's interim appointment expires? Maybe.

Monday, July 18, 2011

Let the Hearings Begin

The NLRB will conduct hearings today and tomorrow on its proposed rules to expedite union representation elections.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Details (and the devil in them)

The NLRB has issued a fact sheet and resources links to provide guidance regarding the dramatic changes in the NLRB's election process. This is a bigger change than anything the current NLRB has done since the 2008 elections. Before a union may represent a group of employees it must establish it is the chosen representative of an un-coerced majority of those employees. Where the issue is contested, the NLRB conducts a secret ballot election. Under the old rules an election is normally conducted between 45 and 60 days from the filing of a petition. The new rules are designed to streamline the process, eliminate an employer's ability to obtain a decision on voter eligibility before the election, and shorten the time between the filing of a petition and the conduction of the election. While this is not EFCA, it certainly advances some of the goals of the failed legislation, primarily very quick elections. Details after the jump

Monday, May 3, 2010

Two to one

The NLRB has released its statistical summary on union representation proceedings for the 6 month period from October 2009-March 2010. Any way you slice it (and the Board slices and dices a lot of information), labor organizations won more than 60% of the elections conducted.