Incrementalism

Mike Elk has a post at In These Times about rebuilding the labor movement. What he gets right is big initiatives by big labor don't work. Organizing workers is a long hard slog. One that requires localizing union solutions for uniquely local problems. This requires hard work, but yields success, albeit in small increments.

Politics as usual

Mike Elk has an interesting post at In these Times concerning labor's professed independence from the Democratic Party and reality, which is continuing support despite few rewards for that support.

Change?

Pro-labor poster Mike Elk gets it partly right in this post. The NLRB is willing to make incremental, mostly symbolic changes in the rules to aid unions in their organizing attempts. He correctly notes the absence of significant remedies for egregious violations. However he gets it plain wrong (like so many others) when he says shortening of time between a petition for an election and the conducting of the election is a cure for employer intimidation. It isn't.   A meaningful, civil, non-threatening dialogue is not only appropriate prior to an important vote, but necessary for an informed electorate. Card check recognition and instant elections hinder an informed vote. If the problem is employer intimidation, punish the employer's misconduct, don't stifle the discourse or impose a different sort of coercion by eliminating secret ballot elections.

Politics of deficit reduction

Is the federal worker pay freeze political theater or deficit reduction reality? Mike Elk's post at labor-friendly In these Times think its Obama's PATCO moment.